[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]

/edu/ - Education

'The weapon of criticism cannot, of course, replace criticism of the weapon, material force must be overthrown by material force; but theory also becomes a material force as soon as it has gripped the masses.' - Karl Marx
Name
Options
Subject
Comment
Flag
File
Embed
Password(For file deletion.)
What is 6 - 2?

Check out our new store at shop.leftypol.org!

| Catalog | Home
|

 

drop them PDFs, we will rebuild edition
308 posts and 614 image replies omitted.

I have constructed two english translations for very important works of 17th century French political economy. First is Antoine Montchretien's "Treatise of Political Economy" (1615), from whence the neologism of "political economy" arises. The second translation is Boisguilbert's "Detail of France" (1695); the expanded second edition of 1707, which includes other works, including his "Factum" (1706) and "Dissertation" (1707). This work is also where Marx sees classical political economy begin in France, developing from the earlier work of William Petty (1662).

On a larger point of 17th century political economy, I will make general comment regarding the turn to free trade, from the writings of William Potter (1651), to Josiah Child (1668) and John Law (1705), who all advocated for the lowering of interest to expand the supply of money. Boisguilbert is equally seen as advancing the laissez-faire tradition, contrary to thinkers of the early 17th century like Montchretien, who guards trade in the typical mercantilist fashion, as a weapon to use against foreigners, rather than a source of mutual benefit - such as we see develop in the second half of the 18th century, particularly with Adam Smith (1776). So then, these texts are important in showing the difference between the attitudes of the century, earlier (1615) and later (1695) in the period, which Marx describes (e.g. Capital Vol. 3, Ch. 36) as the movement from usurer's capital to industrial capital.



 

Everytime you visit /edu/, post in this thread. Tell us about what you're thinking about, what you're reading, an interesting thing you have learned today, anything! Just be sure to pop in and say hi.

Previous thread >>>/leftypol_archive/580500
Archive of previous thread
https://archive.is/saN3S

Excuse me coming through
A quick note on the video @ >>>/leftypol/1538283
Also [vid related] for archival purposes

Around the 29 minute mark Peterson criticizes Marx and Engel's for assuming that workers would magically become more productive once they took over.

This actually happened historically, most of the actually effective productivity tricks work places use now were developed by Stakhanovites.

https://soviethistory.msu.edu/1936-2/year-of-the-stakhanovite/year-of-the-stakhanovite-texts/stalin-at-the-conference-of-stakhanovites/
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
553 posts and 85 image replies omitted.

File: 1774349844033.jpg (1.65 MB, 1920x2560, 1000095839-scaled.jpg)

Another Dutch book. Witte Ko: Herinneringen uit het Gewapend Verzet. This one is not going to win any prizes for its prose, it's a transcript of an interview or a series of interviews.

Jan Brasser (nom de guerre: Witte Ko) was a Dutch communist and resistance fighter. In the book he retells his many actions against the occupier during the war years, actions that he either participated in or ordered. Starting out with acts of organized workplace sabotage as well as strikes and stoppages at the Hoogovens steel factory (modern day Tata steel), Brasser was soon a wanted man and had to go underground. His actions included sabotage, prison breaks, raids on government offices and assassinations. He also risked his life for what I can only describe as a prank, by raising the Soviet flag on a German army outpost after the defeat at Stalingrad.

After the war he worked with the government to bring to justice people who had profited off of the occupation, but was frustrated when he saw many of them walk and enjoy prominent positions in Dutch business. Once he left the service of the government , he was denied his old job at Hoogovens, probably because he was a communist and had proven himself a capable organizer.

Five years of not knowing if he would end the day in front of a firing squad and regularly losing comrades had a major impact on him, not to mention the thousands of kilometers that he cycled and the lack of food during the hunger winter.

Although a third of the Dutch communist party members participated in the resistance, this was soon, and purposefully, forgotten. They were not even allowed to lay a wreath at the grave of their fallen comrade Hannie Schaft when she reburied from her unmarked grave in the dunes. The official remembrance of the february strike too did not allow the participation of the CPN until many years after the war, even though they were the ones who organized it. This last part genuinely pisses me the fuck off, but I've come to expect no better of this country.



File: 1619942123710.png (68.81 KB, 1366x568, East Med 2.png)

 

Post Copy pastas, videos and books which debunk common Fascist, Liberal talking points which are repeated often.
146 posts and 64 image replies omitted.

>>25637
>replies to a literal 5 year old post with a baseless claim
What a fallacious post.

>>20073
> there are also many people who legit do not realize they're being oppressed and exploited, like a lot of workers in the West.
2 year old post but worth addressing; class consciousness and helping proletariat understand the position they are in is necessary but it's not what the majority of these "activists" do. These people are lifestylists no different from twitter NAFO-tards and the preceding /pol/fags. They don't truly believe in what they shill, they don't even care about the people they claim to be fighting for and would gladly attack members of the groups they claim to represent. I have seen this shit happen. These people are usually terminally online and very vocal, making themselves the 'face' of such things. /pol/'s memes about feminists in 2016 weren't generated AI video, they were thousands of radlibs making idiots of themselves and subsequently making anyone they claimed to represent look like idiots too.



File: 1763928931490.webp (191.41 KB, 545x600, OFbTauc.webp)

 

Choosing a language edition

I do not know why we do not have an active language learning thread, so here you go.
If you got other links you think are worthy of being on here, do mention them.

>Language learning communities

r/languagelearning
https://www.reddit.com/r/languagelearning/

Language learner's forum
https://forum.language-learners.org/

Linguaholic's forum
https://linguaholic.com/

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
43 posts and 27 image replies omitted.

>>25414
without my precious mercator projection I can't tell what the green country in west asia is.

>>25854
Romania and Transnistria

Sorry, Moldovia, not Transnistria

Test

>>25414
Harder than English. Chinese sentence structure lacks all those redundant Germanic particles like "the," "an," and "of."



File: 1771120825843.jpg (42.43 KB, 657x1000, scapegoat.jpg)

 

Is all radfem literature like this?

This shit is some of the most ludicrous, hyperbolic grievance mongering I have ever read. There's interesting shit floating around in here, but it is drifting in a sea of "every man is a wife-beating rapist who caused all the world's problems." Even though the book is directly comparing Zionism and feminism and seems to advocate for a lady Israel, it's mostly just couched in whining about men. Dworkin doesn't even have the fucking stones to be a strong Zionist. She's one of these wishy-washy Zionists who thinks that Zionists and Palestinians can co-exist, and maybe one day Israeli and Palestinian women can come together and unite against their REAL enemy: men! (lol) (lmao)
35 posts and 8 image replies omitted.

>>25818
>Reducing Dworkin to "hyperbolic grievance mongering" however is nothing more than an undiluted expression of utter misogyny
The only way you could even begin to believe anything Dworkin wrote is if you believe that women are innocent, hapless, childlike creatures who are entirely incapable of controlling any aspect of their own lives by their own power and whose natural predisposition is to completely submit and grovel before men if they show even the slightest sign of dominance and are not entirely holding themselves back.

I know Dworkinites will deny up and down that she said that all heterosexual sex is rape, but that is simply the natural conclusion of her beliefs. If you define sex partially coerced through massive power imbalance, and also see men strong, dominant and violent while women are feeble, meek, cringing and more or less in a state of perpetual childhood, then you could only conclude that these two groups is a form of rape in the same way that an adult having sex with a child is always a form of rape.

File: 1773615264205.png (546.2 KB, 960x945, ClipboardImage.png)

>>25834
Not what was said, nor an argument. Modern ideology is liberal garbage.

>>25818
>I read Dworkin's account of her relationship with Israel as a thinly veiled analogy to her growing disillusionment with the women's liberation movement.
The very term "women's liberation movement" in this time-period and in a Western context (that she is almost exclusively referring to) is so retarded as to be fucking comedic, if not for the fact that there are stupid entitled burger-women and men that actually subscribe to this ideological bullshit.
>"women's Israel"
<Shilling for nationalist-ethno-state but for a specific sex

>she gives a literary expression to the mass suffering of women as a class

Women are not a separate class, but an identity. Take off that Soviet flag, you bring shame to Marxism-Leninism.
>the barely repressed need for their collective vengeance.
What need? Do you even know what 'need' means? Vengeance on whom?
>nothing more than an undiluted expression of utter misogyny
No, it is dismissing pseudo-intellectual projection of a hateful spinster and not giving the long-winded rubbish more time than it deserves. Calling a cunt out for being a cunt is not misogyny you liberal.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>25742
The problem with Dworkin isn't that she's wrong but that's she's trivial. Marriage and prostitution are both paid rape. Who cares?

>>25843
Having read some Dworkin, I don't know if she ever directly said that because it seems like she never directly says anything ever. All Dworkin does is complain about men, and all positions she is said to hold seems to be more inferred from the exact way that she is complaining about men in any given work rather than directly stated.

>>25742
>this land was promised to women 3000 years ago, we must eradicate all the men here



File: 1764903347246.jpg (493.68 KB, 2000x2000, 2599_Holy_Bible_cvr.jpg)

 

What's the leftypol take on this book? I'm not trolling - it's existence has haunted my life. I was raised catholic… Christianity has both ruined & saved my life and my opinions on it have only gotten more complex.

Some of the greatest art of all time has been religiously motivated. But the question of Christianity specifically is a big one. On one hand all manner of brown people are more sincerely christian than a lot of white people have ever been. It might be the one thing saving Africa right now!

But on the other hand The first Roman Empire & Greek empire were polytheistic & they might have achieved a civilizational peak that surpasses the situation we live in right now. Christianity is very homophobic & a huge portion of Europe/UK demographics are atheist & seem to be some of the happiest nations on earth. Christianity might even be the reason that the Roman Empire fell & is responsible for a lot of really bad imperialism & colonialism.

What am I supposed to make of it? Jesus was surely a good man, no? The word of god has saved homeless, sick, and morally corrupt. Where does the justification to do evil come from when people read this?
33 posts and 7 image replies omitted.

>>25769
*Outside of Christianity

Ftfy

>>25495
But that's the way adults treat children.

File: 1771257116208.png (316.03 KB, 600x1040, epstein_cannibalism.png)

Rich people are demons

<The man's unsubstantiated allegations of "ritualistic sacrifice" appeared in an email exchange between an apparent FBI agent and New York police detective, per the DOJ's records (the file name is "EFTA00147661" (archived)). The DOJ appeared to have removed this file from the Epstein Library after Snopes first reported this story. We contacted the department to ask why and await a reply.


https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/first/contra2_list.html
This is a good site to free christcucks from their fairy tales
>>25468
outside of Israel at least, where it is a daily occurence.



File: 1773966236888.webm (4.88 MB, 1066x768, the interjection.webm)

 

I'm getting an associates at a community college since it's cheaper to do general education courses here than at a university. I want to major in a math subject for my bachelors but am pretty bad at math.

Basic Math by Lang

Elements, by Euclid

Studying mathematics isn't even worth it. AI will automate math research, and you're contributing to propping up capitalism anyway.

>>25875
Any form g white collar work is often the least prospects AI or not



 

What awaits the future? Why is college still so popular now?

The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.The body was too short or empty.

> is college still so popular now?
People hate stoop labor, service work, and industrial work just that much



 

I convinced a quite a big amount of Muslim friends and even Elder Muslim folks in my community that Capitalism is Haram with one simple argument: Usury is a sin under the the rule of "Riba" being Haram, literally meaning "infinite" or "excess" in Arabic, due to financial exploitation and taking advantage of the person.

Simple

>Infinite growth is a sin requires financial exploitation, and making money off of being idle

>Capitalism's main ethos is infinite profit extraction
>They connect the dots

This opens them up to other arguments like "Infinite growth is impossible on a planet with finite resources" and other things like excess, indulgence and things Capitalists encourage like gambling being a sin (Prediction markets are awful)

I then explain it's like pork, you can eat pork or drink alcohol if you need to if there is nothing else to eat or you need to numb pain under the Islamic law of Rukhsah (Exemptions out of health or other necessities) and we are forced to participate in it order to survive

This easily convinces a lot of Muslims, even ones I meet in the global south who are otherwise very conservative and even if I can't make them fully woke or whatever it's good to have people wake up to some injustice at least. Class interests come first

The main thing I'm asking is if anyone knows any similar works on Socialism from an Islamic perspective using this same logic or at least pre-modern Islamic works that meet the base principles of socialism and wants to discuss this further
6 posts omitted.

>>25796
>>25798
There’s this common assumption that education makes people less religious and less racist.
It’s been repeated so much that people treat academia as the new religion

the key is to not simply be against usury, but also against profit, rent, and wages. Communism seeks to abolish the wages system. profit, interest, rent, and wages are all part of the system of exploitation.

>>25821
depends on the kind of education

>>25823
Education in general

>>25821
Western style higher education, especially STEM fields, embody the epistemology and ideology of secularism and capitalism. You'll notice that most chuds and neo stalinists are people from STEM backgrounds i.e. people who believe we can rationally predict and plan all human affairs with statistics, the scientific method etc.



File: 1672226105595.png (4.36 MB, 2963x1876, ClipboardImage.png)

 

what was the name of that pre-WW2 German author that wrote how stereotypically non "aryan" germans were typically the most fanatical Nazis because they knew that they were on the fringe of being considered racially acceptable. Note how the entire high command of the nazi apparatus were a men who were mostly dark-haired, brown-eyed and somewhat short by german standards and who personally proved the lunacy of the aryan "race" as a concept by their mere existence
15 posts and 3 image replies omitted.

>>25711
So more “Pink Swastika” nonsense, I am genuinely sick of the frequent comments that any outward display of violence or bigotry means someone is a self-hating closet case. Do people really think no straight man has ever been insecure about his masculinity? Is it really not obvious that queerphobia and strict adherence to traditional gender roles can be motivated by something other than self-hatred?

File: 1773853740112.png (360.13 KB, 479x708, ClipboardImage.png)

>>25711
>Arthur Kronfeld
>German-Jewish psychiatrist
>Founded the The Institute for Sexual Science
>He claimed that he had scared the living daylights out of those nasty Nazis.
LOL

>>25784
Nazis were and continue to be gay and insecure

>>25848
Fascism and MLism are brothers jackass

>>25850
and other hilarious jokes you can tell yourself.



Delete Post [ ]
[ home / rules / faq / search ] [ overboard / sfw / alt ] [ leftypol / edu / labor / siberia / lgbt / latam / hobby / tech / games / anime / music / draw / AKM / ufo ] [ meta ] [ wiki / shop / tv / tiktok / twitter / patreon ] [ GET / ref / marx / booru ]
Previous[ 1 /2 /3 /4 /5 /6 /7 /8 /9 /10 /11 /12 /13 /14 /15 /16 /17 /18 /19 /20 /21 /22 /23 /24 /25 /26 /27 /28 /29 /30 /31 /32 /33 /34 /35 /36 ]
| Catalog | Home