>>1822010guerrilla movements are as strong as the political support from them in the areas they operate
consequently, an urban guerrilla movement needs mass support for their goals and methods in the neighborhoods they exist in
This has been the case before, but single barrios can be corralled and laid siege to, and this works relatively effectively to reduce resistance.
So what's also needed is connection with a wider movement, so that blockades and surveillance can be broken, or militants moved and along with solidarity movements in other areas, the state's resources stretched thin.
There's no organizational model for this, since the key isn't in who knows what, who decides what and who does what. It's about the strength of the overall movement. But this does give us at least a way to measure the movement. E.g. 1) how widespread? (cities, neighborhoods active in?) 2) how popular? (and, passive or active support?) 3) how interconnected are the different branches, and how mobile are resources?
As far as organizing, I think if you want to be an organizer right now you have to accept that our generation is not the generation that makes it out. We need to be openly and conspicuously advocating our views in order to attract similar people, educate the people around, and exist as an alternative in people's minds. The people that we pull in as the state clamps down will be the only ones who really benefit from clandestine organizational structures, because they won't be already known to the state. It's my belief that they will be the ones to make it out and build communism for us. We don't have the luxury of clandestinity, because we need to locate each other and grow. There's no foolproof way to solve this problem; it's only a problem insofar as we want to save ourselves as individuals. You can't have transparency and opacity too. I think communism just requires that we accept this is our fate, and if we get got we get got, but at least we had fun along the way.