No.1790865[View All]
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-68526972
>Princess of Wales: Kate image withdrawn by three news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns
>Three photo agencies have retracted a picture of the Princess of Wales over concerns it has been "manipulated".
>The image, taken by Prince William and issued by Kensington Palace for Mother's Day, showed Catherine with their three children.
>But Associated Press was the first to pull the image as it "did not meet" the agency's photo standards. The agency noted an "inconsistency in the alignment of Princess Charlotte's left hand".
>Kensington Palace declined to comment.
>The photo shows the princess sitting down, surrounded by Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis and Prince George, the latter wrapping his arms around her.
>It was the first official photo of the Princess of Wales since her abdominal surgery two months ago. Since then she has stayed out of the public eye.
>The image was posted on the Prince and Princess of Wales's social media accounts with a message from Catherine which said: "Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.
>"Wishing everyone a Happy Mother's Day."The latest edition of the iconic thread.
We need to shut this country down until we can figure out just what the hell is going on here!
428 posts and 74 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. No.1841664
>>1841662Not to be taught about in schools*
Big typo there lmao
No.1842955
https://twitter.com/Lowkey0nline/status/1786311986227102159'Labour activist' in Manchester runs over 4 activists from Worker's Party in their car.
No.1843026
>>1842917What's the deal with these grey number plates, I keep seeing them around but I thought they had to be white or yellow.
No.1843031
So the anti-Galloway sentiment here is pushed by a few Scottish nationalists who are still salty that he opposed their shitty booj nationalist pet project? Yes?
No.1843054
>>1843031You didn't see his pro-homophobia interview the other day?
No.1843057
>>1843031no. it would have reflected almost equally badly on him and his opportunism if he had joined the Alba party and declared he was a born-again Scottish Nationalist. (though that would've at least spared him the embarassment of proudly declaring he was voting Tory in his constituency.)
No.1843083
>>1843061I just don't see Donald saying such a thing. If anything, Mickey would be the collaborator; he was Disney's most prized creation.
No.1843549
>>1843083He's the one copyright free now though.
No.1843588
>>1843026they are harder for the police cameras to read.
No.1843598
>>1843057He had a Novara Interview and he went off on a weird one about Gays not being 'normal'.
The interview isn't out yet but it looks like the standard Galloway self-sabotage procedure.
I sincerely don't know WTF is wrong with that guy sometimes.
It's not as bad as the Naz Shar incident but i sincerely want to shake it out of him whilst shouting 'WHY CAN'T YOU JUST BE NORMAL' until he's fixed.
In a just world he'd be given some hard socialisation and labour until rehabilitated.
No.1843938
>>1843598That or send him to the Birmingham gulag
No.1844124
>>1843588So basically a nice warning sign that the person driving the car is a cunt? Like those ones with the raised letters.
No.1844335
https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1786751141419667628"The BBC is also willing to call this election, and to say that Sadiq Khan will indeed be elected as the next mayor of London"
Prof Sir John Curtice says the "best estimate" is that Khan will end up with "about 45% of the vote"
No.1844498
>>1844457Better than the Tories
No.1844667
>>1844498Functionally zero difference
No.1844678
>>1844667sir starnner will be even more right wing than the tories
No.1844733
>>1844678We're not talking about Starmer though, Sadiq Khan is alright.
No.1844749
>>1844733>Sadiq Khan is alright.He's scum.
No.1844752
>>1844749I mean sure he's a mainstream politician but isn't he better than average?
No.1844770
>>1844752For what he is, and that's the front man for a city really being ran by international banking cartels, property speculators and foreign crime syndicates, he's fine I guess.
No.1844774
>>1844757Based. Hopefully others follow his lead!
No.1845711
stewart lee is a massive lib isn't he?
i feel like he plays coy with it (oh but you see he's playing a guardian reading lib, that's the character…), but when your guardian column is still taking pot-shots at the conservatives in the days when they're polling marginally below the Class War Party, while the Labour leader is wearing a tie made from the skin of dead gazan babies, it's pretty conspicuous what you're playing at.
No.1845719
Is it bad that I get a hit of sadistic glee whenever I see nationalists seething about muslim politicians.
No.1845798
>>1845711Wasn't he on the anti-corbyn bandwagon?
No.1845804
>>1845800Watched this.
IDK why he's like this, if he didn't lean hard in to the 'gays are not normal' thing he would have come away from this with a broader base of support.
No.1845827
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/04/green-party-mothin-ali-allahu-akba-leeds-gipton-harehills/Victorious Green Party councilor shouts "Allahu Akbar" after "Win for Gaza". Telegraph readers in shambles.
No.1845843
>>1844512protocols of the wahabi imams of medina
No.1845865
>>1841549He is obviously pandering to his Muslim voter base.
Expect to see a lot more of this in certain cities.
No.1845969
>>1845947completely and utterly retarded post with the bonus of accidental ambiguity over whether you're whining about the muslims or the scots.
No.1845978
>>1845969Which part of my post offends you? Do tell me.
Oh and I think both political islam and scottish nationalism are going to play a large part in killing the union btw. But the end of the union isn't something I would consider to be a negative development either.
No.1845990
>>1845978the idea of the UK ending up with violent ethnic conflict on the level of yugoslavia is facile. if the UK breaks apart it'll have next to nothing to do with immigration or race (instead it'll just be the celtic fringes drifting away from England with a shrug.), and that's where the comparisons are at their
closest. in terms of racial/ethnic/religious tensions, they're not even a blip on the radar compared to what happened in yugoslavia.
No.1845991
>>1841584Bait of the highest order. The kind of bait that lefts you wondering why did people answer in good faith.
No.1845995
>>1845990This post is hilarious because only an ignorant zoomer could have written such Bollocks. You are aware that up until two decades ago the UK and to a certain degree up until today the UK was shook by sectarian violence and a low level civil war?
No.1846000
>>1845995northern ireland and the rest of the UK is nothing alike, you think if there's scots independence there will be death squads roaming the streets?
No.1846004
>>1845990You would be surprised how quickly these things can snowball. A common theme among accounts of ethnic conflicts in places like Yugoslavia, Turkey, Africa and the former USSR is that people say those killing eachother were peacefully and happily co-existing just weeks-months before everything went to shit. There was little to no ethnic tension in the USSR in the early 1980s, but look how quickly that changed. All you need is a few retarded nationalists agitating on a local level, mixed with some economic collapse, and people just go insane.
Also the biggest riots in this country over the past 10 years were EDL demonstrations, and then the BLM protests in 2020. Both were racially charged in nature, so I don't think it's as much of a non-issue as you're making it out to be.
No.1846020
>>18459951. the troubles at their worst were nothing compared to yugoslavia.
2. nobody in the mainland UK gives a fuck about northern ireland.
3. i cannot emphasize #1 and #2 enough. "what about the troubles?" yeah mate, i'll put it down just above the vectis national party sex offender on list of things that don't compare to fucking Sarajevo.
>>1846004nationalist autism in eastern europe and the balkans has always been more intense than in Britain and Ireland. you may recall the first world war was kickstarted by a sudden bout of it.
the scottish and welsh nationalists, meanwhile, can't even rise to the level of an illegal referendum. (one of the reasons they're possibly fucked - they've got terrible illusions about liberal institutions even after watching the EU sit back and give Spain a free hand to beat the fuck out of the Catalonians)
more prosaically, there's a simple lack of territorial disputes. Yugoslavia was rife with "Oh, this area of Bosnia is actually Serbian/Croatian…" but the borders of Scotland, England, and Wales are unambiguous. (Even with Northern Ireland, everyone agrees what it is - they just don't agree who should be in charge of it!). only people who're having fun go digging around to remember that Edinburgh is rightful Northumbrian clay.
If Scotland or Wales were a Yugoslav nation they'd be Slovenia, who - thanks to having basically no border disputes anda fairly homogenous ethnic distribution - fucked off in 10 days with little worse than a helicopter crash to show for it.
No.1846026
>>1845827The right amount of seethe. Carefully balanced, as all things should be.
Unique IPs: 27