>>32835I can't be bothered to explain it right now, so I'll do a half assed job. Hopefully somebody picks up the slack.
I'll rephrase your question, not to mock you but to encourage you to think differently.
>to me sexuality lacks a nature of class and you can basically find women of all political views in some corner of the world, it seems more a topic of psychology and biology.Does that mean that classed oppression of women doesn't exist? Or that because rich women exist then misogyny/patriarchy is no longer a relevant social issue? Just like Obama doesn't cure anti black racism, neither does Hillary cure the patriarchical social norms.
While the biology and psychology of women play a large role in the challenges they face (notice how I'm declassing women here on purpose), these challenges exist in relation to the broader society, including in how women relate to the process of production.
Women are frequently cast aside, not taken seriously, rejected in the workplace. Further, because of (cis) women's unique lifestyle choice of bearing children or not, they are also put in a myriad of positions that are detrimental to their social standing, like being treated as delicate, or not considered for leadership positions due to potentially missing work. Further, biological features inherent in many women makes them vulnerable to physical abuse.
Without getting too much into it as another author in the queer Marxist literature already wrote a good book about it (the origin of family etc by Xirself, Engels), patriarchical society was borne from the class relations in which our current society exists, and as such, many of those relations either remain de jure, or at the level of society's ideology.
Queer Marxist theory investigates the presupposed ways in which gender norms, family values, etc are reproduced in society, and gives us an analytic framework with which to pry away at bourgeoise notions of gender norms, including sexual orientation, gendered bodies and gendered medical views, transness vs cisness, and how these aspects of our social existence are intricately related to racism, colonialism, capitalism, the imposition of capitalism around the world, and our historically contingent understanding of sexuality.
You misunderstand Marxism when you merely apply it to class. Marxism isn't about classes. Marxism is about holistic analysis of processes of classed society. By studying things in a vacuum, instead of in relation to the things by which it is mediated by, you remove one of the most powerful aspects of Marxist analysis and you fall back into a liberal mode of analysis.
The liberation of queernes itself is none other than the liberation of humanity of the shackles of class society. At the nucleus of queerphobia lies the imposition of gender norms, and with that as well lies the imposition of class society. Essentially, queer Marxist then, is the next step in understanding the deep rooted mechanism of domination of class society.